Many cultures have legends of human-like but non-human creatures. The sasquatch (“big foot”), the yeti, and this one from central America is quite similar in many ways. My guess is that these are “normal” animals with a vaguely human shape glimpsed under poor lighting conditions. The Wikipedia entry for El Chupacabra says that the best evidence is that these are actually diseased dogs.
Many cultures have legends of human-like but non-human creatures. The sasquatch (“big foot”), the yeti, and this one from central America is quite similar in many ways. My guess is that these are “normal” animals with a vaguely human shape glimpsed under poor lighting conditions. The Wikipedia entry for El Chupacabra says that the best evidence is that these are actually diseased dogs.
0
No, I do not.
There would be evidence – skeletons, hair, camera trap sightings, etc. if it were.
0
I also think its not real.
I found it interesting that when the British biologists first found a Platypus and sent it back to England they believed it was a joke!
0
No, I don’t think so. Like amid said, I’d like to see evidence to believe things like this.
0